Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,454,084 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.519. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to an increase of 13.7 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $43,266, a difference of 18.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,341 compared to $72,178, a difference of 12.7%), and median household income ($75,123 compared to $66,768, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,444 compared to $34,317, a difference of 3.3%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and median earnings ($40,851 compared to $39,169, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 20.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.51%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.71%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 28.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 18.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.3%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 10.5%), and family households (65.0% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 1.9%), currently married (42.6% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 30.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 16.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 49.7%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 14.8%), and college, under 1 year (56.2% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 14.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 14.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.79%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.97%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.2%).