Austrian vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,570,522 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Austrian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.605. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Austrians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.445% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Austrians corresponds to an increase of 445.5 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,842 compared to $72,178, a difference of 41.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,692 compared to $77,850, a difference of 39.6%), and median household income ($91,339 compared to $66,768, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,923 compared to $34,317, a difference of 19.3%), householder income under 25 years ($51,898 compared to $43,266, a difference of 20.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,470 compared to $51,393, a difference of 25.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 55.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 52.9%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 5.9%), single father poverty (17.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 11.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 38.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.5% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.46%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 41.3%), married-couple households (48.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 24.5%), and currently married (48.7% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.72%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (64.5% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 29.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 22.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 12.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 45.2%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 41.6%), and master's degree (16.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.83%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 34.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 19.4%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.33%), male disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.57%), and disability (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.5%).