Tohono O'odham vs Serbian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Serbian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Serbians

Tragic
Excellent
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,746
SOCIAL INDEX
84.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
53rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Serbian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,538,340 people shows a near-perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Serbians within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.903. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.029% in Serbians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 28.9 Serbians.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Serbian Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Serbian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $46,551, a difference of 53.9%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $107,157, a difference of 48.4%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $57,975, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $51,106, a difference of 13.0%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $40,539, a difference of 22.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $61,087, a difference of 24.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Serbian Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamSerbian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Exceptional
$46,551
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Exceptional
$107,157
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Excellent
$87,572
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Exceptional
$48,677
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Exceptional
$57,975
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Excellent
$40,539
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Tragic
$51,106
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Excellent
$98,320
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Excellent
$103,522
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Average
$61,087
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
27.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Serbian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 160.8%), family poverty (20.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 156.3%), and male poverty (22.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 124.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 34.5%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 50.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 62.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs Serbian Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamSerbian
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Excellent
13.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Excellent
16.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
15.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Average
16.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Excellent
28.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
10.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Serbian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 101.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 99.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 89.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 21.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Serbian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamSerbian
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
5.1%

Tohono O'odham vs Serbian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 27.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 11.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs Serbian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamSerbian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Good
65.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
83.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Serbian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 74.5%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 62.4%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 59.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.12%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and family households (67.1% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 6.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Serbian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamSerbian
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
63.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Tragic
3.12
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Average
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Good
30.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Serbian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 65.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 12.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Serbian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamSerbian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
90.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Poor
6.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Serbian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 69.0%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 65.5%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 64.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.52%).
Tohono O'odham vs Serbian Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamSerbian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
97.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.7%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
67.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
40.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
16.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Excellent
2.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Serbian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 67.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 61.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.1%), cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 15.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Serbian Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamSerbian
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Poor
11.5%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.4%