Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,977,419 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.462. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 3.7 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $51,770, a difference of 71.1%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $116,165, a difference of 60.9%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $62,217, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $54,352, a difference of 20.1%), wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 23.2%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $43,571, a difference of 31.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 166.0%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 144.8%), and male poverty (22.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 128.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 35.9%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 57.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 62.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 99.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 92.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 87.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 9.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 88.0%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 75.6%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 71.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.7%), family households (67.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 32.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 104.5%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 91.1%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 80.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 82.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 71.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 67.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.8%), cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 18.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.3%).