Tohono O'odham vs South African Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
South African
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

South Africans

Tragic
Excellent
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,851
SOCIAL INDEX
86.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
44th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

South African Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,624,576 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of South Africans within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.794. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in South Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 15.6 South Africans.
Tohono O'odham Integration in South African Communities

Tohono O'odham vs South African Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and South African communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $50,044, a difference of 65.4%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $113,229, a difference of 56.8%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $61,460, a difference of 55.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $51,383, a difference of 13.6%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $41,825, a difference of 26.0%), and wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 26.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs South African Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamSouth African
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Exceptional
$50,044
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Exceptional
$113,229
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Exceptional
$93,379
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Exceptional
$50,752
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Exceptional
$61,460
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Exceptional
$41,825
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Poor
$51,383
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Exceptional
$103,160
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Exceptional
$109,719
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Exceptional
$65,652
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
28.0%

Tohono O'odham vs South African Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and South African communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 147.9%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 145.6%), and receiving food stamps (21.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 115.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 36.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 46.9%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 50.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs South African Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamSouth African
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Excellent
12.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
21.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Excellent
13.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Exceptional
16.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Excellent
15.5%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Average
12.8%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
10.0%

Tohono O'odham vs South African Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and South African communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 101.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 99.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 83.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs South African Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamSouth African
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Good
5.4%

Tohono O'odham vs South African Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and South African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 17.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 14.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 9.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs South African Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamSouth African
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Good
65.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Average
36.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Fair
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Fair
82.6%

Tohono O'odham vs South African Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and South African communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 78.8%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 63.4%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (67.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 5.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs South African Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamSouth African
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Tragic
3.17
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
47.6%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Excellent
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Excellent
30.5%

Tohono O'odham vs South African Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and South African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 52.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs South African Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamSouth African
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Good
10.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Good
90.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Fair
6.2%

Tohono O'odham vs South African Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and South African communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 100.2%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 86.5%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 78.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.41%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.41%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%).
Tohono O'odham vs South African Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamSouth African
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
92.4%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
69.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
64.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
51.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
43.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
18.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
5.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.3%

Tohono O'odham vs South African Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and South African communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 95.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 64.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.3%), cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 14.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs South African Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamSouth African
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Exceptional
21.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
45.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Fair
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.3%