Tohono O'odham vs Soviet Union Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Soviet Union
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Soviet Union

Tragic
Good
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,833
SOCIAL INDEX
75.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
103rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Soviet Union Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 25,680,095 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Soviet Union. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 0.5 Soviet Union.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Soviet Union Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Soviet Union Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $54,202, a difference of 79.1%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $119,262, a difference of 65.2%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $63,382, a difference of 60.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 9.3%), householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $55,340, a difference of 22.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $62,848, a difference of 28.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs Soviet Union Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamSoviet Union
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Exceptional
$54,202
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Exceptional
$119,262
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Exceptional
$95,098
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Exceptional
$54,290
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Exceptional
$63,382
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Exceptional
$46,556
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Exceptional
$55,340
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Exceptional
$108,457
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Exceptional
$112,008
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Excellent
$62,848
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Exceptional
24.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Soviet Union Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 144.9%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 130.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (31.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 118.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 32.3%), single father poverty (22.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 54.4%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 57.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Soviet Union Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamSoviet Union
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
8.3%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
27.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
12.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
14.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Excellent
11.1%

Tohono O'odham vs Soviet Union Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 95.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 94.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 83.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Soviet Union Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamSoviet Union
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Poor
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Soviet Union Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 14.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 9.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Soviet Union Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamSoviet Union
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Average
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Good
83.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Soviet Union Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 113.0%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 89.5%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 78.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 7.8%), family households (67.1% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 12.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Soviet Union Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamSoviet Union
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
60.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
24.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Fair
46.2%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
26.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Soviet Union Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 49.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 33.0%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 11.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Soviet Union Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamSoviet Union
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
17.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
82.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Tragic
45.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Tragic
14.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
4.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Soviet Union Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 130.7%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 111.5%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 96.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.15%), 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
Tohono O'odham vs Soviet Union Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamSoviet Union
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Good
98.0%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
94.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
71.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
55.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
47.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
20.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
6.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Soviet Union Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 131.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 81.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 16.6%), disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 22.8%), and self-care disability (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Soviet Union Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamSoviet Union
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Fair
2.5%