Tohono O'odham vs Cambodian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cambodian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Cambodians

Tragic
Exceptional
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,346
SOCIAL INDEX
90.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
19th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cambodian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,819,032 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Cambodians within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Cambodians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 12.1 Cambodians.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Cambodian Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Cambodian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $51,731, a difference of 71.0%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $117,780, a difference of 63.1%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $62,516, a difference of 58.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 16.7%), householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $55,571, a difference of 22.8%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $45,014, a difference of 35.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Cambodian Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamCambodian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Exceptional
$51,731
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Exceptional
$117,780
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Exceptional
$96,324
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Exceptional
$53,386
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Exceptional
$62,516
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Exceptional
$45,014
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Exceptional
$55,571
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Exceptional
$107,148
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Exceptional
$114,342
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Exceptional
$66,892
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Average
25.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Cambodian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 160.6%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 149.5%), and receiving food stamps (21.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 125.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 34.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 58.9%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 59.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Cambodian Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamCambodian
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
12.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Exceptional
14.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
14.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
11.8%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Fair
16.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
27.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
9.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Cambodian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 106.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 104.4%), and male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 103.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 26.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Cambodian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamCambodian
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Cambodian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 18.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 17.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 10.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 10.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Cambodian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamCambodian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
67.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Exceptional
81.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Good
37.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
86.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
84.1%

Tohono O'odham vs Cambodian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 94.0%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 86.8%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 72.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 5.5%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and family households (67.1% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 9.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Cambodian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamCambodian
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
61.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
26.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
26.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Cambodian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 43.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 5.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 6.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Cambodian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamCambodian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Tragic
53.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
5.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Cambodian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 109.6%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 106.0%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 93.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.27%).
Tohono O'odham vs Cambodian Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamCambodian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
88.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
47.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
20.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Cambodian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 89.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 70.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 65.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 11.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.3%), and disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 23.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs Cambodian Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamCambodian
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Exceptional
21.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Fair
17.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.2%