Tohono O'odham vs French Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
French
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

French

Tragic
Average
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,755
SOCIAL INDEX
55.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
169th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

French Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,625,455 people shows no correlation between the proportion of French within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.039. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in French. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 3.4 French.
Tohono O'odham Integration in French Communities

Tohono O'odham vs French Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and French communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $43,685, a difference of 44.4%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $102,368, a difference of 41.8%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $55,350, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $51,230, a difference of 13.2%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $38,457, a difference of 15.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $59,656, a difference of 21.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs French Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamFrench
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Average
$43,685
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Average
$102,368
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Fair
$83,468
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Average
$46,296
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Good
$55,350
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Tragic
$38,457
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Tragic
$51,230
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Fair
$93,665
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Average
$99,824
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Fair
$59,656
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
28.7%

Tohono O'odham vs French Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and French communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 158.6%), family poverty (20.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 147.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (20.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 115.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 21.1%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 40.3%), and single male poverty (21.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 49.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs French Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamFrench
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
8.3%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Fair
17.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Good
15.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Good
15.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Good
16.0%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
14.4%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
18.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
30.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
10.7%

Tohono O'odham vs French Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and French communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 101.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 98.6%), and unemployment (8.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 83.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 10.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs French Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamFrench
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Poor
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Poor
5.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
10.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Excellent
5.2%

Tohono O'odham vs French Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and French communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 34.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 13.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 9.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs French Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamFrench
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Tragic
63.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
42.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Tragic
82.2%

Tohono O'odham vs French Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and French communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 61.3%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 52.1%), and births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 4.8%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 6.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs French Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamFrench
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Fair
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
48.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
12.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Tragic
33.4%

Tohono O'odham vs French Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and French communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 110.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 19.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 4.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 13.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs French Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamFrench
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
7.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
92.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
21.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
6.9%

Tohono O'odham vs French Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and French communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 55.8%), bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 49.3%), and professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.72%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.72%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.74%).
Tohono O'odham vs French Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamFrench
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
95.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
91.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Average
65.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Fair
58.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Fair
45.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Poor
36.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Fair
14.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Average
1.8%

Tohono O'odham vs French Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and French communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 50.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 32.0%), and ambulatory disability (8.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.0%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 11.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs French Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamFrench
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
13.2%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Poor
23.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.5%