Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Lithuania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Immigrants from Lithuania

Tragic
Exceptional
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,656
SOCIAL INDEX
94.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
10th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Lithuania Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,957,562 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.182. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 3.4 Immigrants from Lithuania.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Immigrants from Lithuania Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Lithuania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $51,361, a difference of 69.8%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $118,053, a difference of 63.5%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $63,346, a difference of 60.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $55,028, a difference of 21.6%), wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 29.2%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $43,317, a difference of 30.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Lithuania Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Lithuania
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Exceptional
$51,361
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Exceptional
$118,053
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Exceptional
$96,836
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Exceptional
$52,769
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Exceptional
$63,346
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Exceptional
$43,317
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Exceptional
$55,028
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Exceptional
$108,149
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Exceptional
$114,336
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Exceptional
$66,087
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
28.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Lithuania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 182.5%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 159.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (31.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 145.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 43.8%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 70.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 74.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Lithuania Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Lithuania
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
10.3%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
17.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Exceptional
11.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Exceptional
14.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
12.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
13.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
13.1%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Exceptional
17.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
25.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
9.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Lithuania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 97.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 95.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 95.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 21.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Lithuania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Lithuania
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
5.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Lithuania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 19.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 15.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 10.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 11.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Lithuania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Lithuania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Excellent
37.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
83.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Lithuania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 102.7%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 79.7%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 73.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 4.6%), family households (67.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 6.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Lithuania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Lithuania
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
48.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
27.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Lithuania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 59.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 11.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Lithuania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Lithuania
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Good
55.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Tragic
18.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
5.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Lithuania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 95.9%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 90.5%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 82.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.46%), 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.46%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.47%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Lithuania Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Lithuania
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
93.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
70.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
52.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
44.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
18.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
5.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Lithuania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 75.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 74.6%), and disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 72.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 20.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 25.8%), and disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 26.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Lithuania Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Lithuania
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
9.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Exceptional
20.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
44.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
16.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.3%