Tohono O'odham vs Scandinavian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Scandinavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Scandinavians

Tragic
Good
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,944
SOCIAL INDEX
76.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
98th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Scandinavian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,904,371 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.831. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.093% in Scandinavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 92.9 Scandinavians.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Scandinavian Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Scandinavian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $43,848, a difference of 44.9%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $104,410, a difference of 44.6%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $55,527, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $38,306, a difference of 15.4%), householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $52,654, a difference of 16.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $61,586, a difference of 25.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Scandinavian Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamScandinavian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Average
$43,848
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Good
$104,410
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Good
$86,073
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Average
$46,433
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Good
$55,527
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Tragic
$38,306
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Good
$52,654
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Good
$95,596
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Good
$102,969
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Good
$61,586
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
29.1%

Tohono O'odham vs Scandinavian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 170.4%), family poverty (20.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 167.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (20.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 128.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 35.2%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 48.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 53.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Scandinavian Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamScandinavian
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
11.1%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
7.6%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
12.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Fair
20.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Exceptional
15.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
14.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
9.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Scandinavian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 116.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 109.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 98.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Scandinavian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamScandinavian
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Scandinavian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 39.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 14.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 10.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Scandinavian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamScandinavian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Exceptional
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Good
83.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Scandinavian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 67.5%), single father households (3.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 60.7%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 58.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.10%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (67.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Scandinavian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamScandinavian
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
49.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
29.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Scandinavian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 122.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 25.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 9.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 20.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 24.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Scandinavian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamScandinavian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
7.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
93.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Exceptional
62.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
23.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
8.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Scandinavian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 54.1%), bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 53.7%), and professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.71%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.71%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.72%).
Tohono O'odham vs Scandinavian Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamScandinavian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
97.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
96.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
91.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
67.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Excellent
61.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Good
46.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Average
37.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Fair
14.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Average
1.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Scandinavian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 54.0%), ambulatory disability (8.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 42.4%), and disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.5%), and cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 13.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Scandinavian Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamScandinavian
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Average
23.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.4%