Tohono O'odham vs Ute Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Ute

Tragic
Fair
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ute Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,307,060 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Ute within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 2.9 Ute.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Ute Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Ute Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ute communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 25.4%), median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $48,899, a difference of 23.7%), and median family income ($72,193 compared to $87,596, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $34,960, a difference of 5.3%), householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $52,949, a difference of 7.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $49,997, a difference of 10.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Ute Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamUte
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Tragic
$36,651
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Tragic
$87,596
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Tragic
$72,402
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Tragic
$41,051
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Tragic
$48,899
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Tragic
$34,960
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Tragic
$49,997
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Tragic
$82,166
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Tragic
$83,937
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Tragic
$52,949
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
27.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Ute Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ute communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 74.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (20.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 71.3%), and family poverty (20.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 69.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 18.9%), single female poverty (34.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 20.4%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 20.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Ute Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamUte
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
16.9%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
16.2%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
17.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
25.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Tragic
17.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Tragic
23.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
21.8%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
15.7%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Tragic
28.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
35.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
14.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Ute Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 80.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 76.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 58.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Ute Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamUte
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Tragic
19.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
11.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
5.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Ute Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 18.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 4.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Ute Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamUte
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Tragic
60.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Good
37.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
80.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Tragic
76.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Ute Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ute communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 51.0%), single father households (3.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 29.1%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.51%), average family size (3.53 compared to 3.49, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (67.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 4.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Ute Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamUte
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Average
64.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Tragic
44.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Exceptional
3.49
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
7.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Tragic
43.9%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Poor
33.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Ute Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 34.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 32.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 13.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 20.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Ute Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamUte
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
11.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
22.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
8.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Ute Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ute communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 41.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 38.2%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.34%).
Tohono O'odham vs Ute Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamUte
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Average
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Average
95.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Fair
93.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Tragic
91.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
89.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
86.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
81.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Tragic
60.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Tragic
53.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
30.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
11.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Ute Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 154.1%), ambulatory disability (8.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 46.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 4.6%), disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 11.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Ute Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamUte
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
0.86%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Tragic
27.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Tragic
52.6%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Average
2.5%