Tohono O'odham vs Latvian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Latvian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Latvians
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Latvian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,619,023 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 0.2 Latvians.
Tohono O'odham vs Latvian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $52,649, a difference of 74.0%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $120,301, a difference of 66.6%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $63,498, a difference of 60.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $52,783, a difference of 16.7%), wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 25.9%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $43,941, a difference of 32.3%).
Income Metric | Tohono O'odham | Latvian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,256 | Exceptional $52,649 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $72,193 | Exceptional $120,301 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $61,663 | Exceptional $97,311 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,349 | Exceptional $53,001 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $39,543 | Exceptional $63,498 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,205 | Exceptional $43,941 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,248 | Excellent $52,783 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $69,068 | Exceptional $108,926 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,774 | Exceptional $115,957 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $49,121 | Exceptional $67,326 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.1% | Tragic 27.9% |
Tohono O'odham vs Latvian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 188.1%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 187.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (31.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 140.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 33.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 59.2%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 60.1%).
Poverty Metric | Tohono O'odham | Latvian |
Poverty | Tragic 24.4% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Families | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Males | Tragic 22.9% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 31.0% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 24.7% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 29.5% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 31.7% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.6% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 34.2% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 22.0% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.0% | Exceptional 26.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 20.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 19.1% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Tohono O'odham vs Latvian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 109.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 101.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 101.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 24.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Tohono O'odham | Latvian |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 10.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 22.1% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.8% | Excellent 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 10.2% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Tohono O'odham vs Latvian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 24.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 15.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 10.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 11.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tohono O'odham | Latvian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.2% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 70.4% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.3% | Exceptional 38.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 68.6% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 77.5% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 77.7% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.1% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 75.1% | Exceptional 83.8% |
Tohono O'odham vs Latvian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 90.6%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 79.8%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 72.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.5%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and family households (67.1% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 7.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Tohono O'odham | Latvian |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 62.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 37.9% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.53 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 36.8% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 49.8% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Tohono O'odham vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 59.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 12.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tohono O'odham | Latvian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.6% | Excellent 9.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.7% | Excellent 90.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 50.0% | Excellent 56.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.9% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Fair 6.1% |
Tohono O'odham vs Latvian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 119.4%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 104.2%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 88.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.65%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.66%).
Education Level Metric | Tohono O'odham | Latvian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Poor 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.6% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.1% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.6% | Exceptional 94.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.7% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 82.1% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 77.5% | Exceptional 89.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 52.8% | Exceptional 71.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 47.1% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 31.8% | Exceptional 53.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 24.4% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 19.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Tohono O'odham vs Latvian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 69.8%), disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 66.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 64.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.6%), cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 15.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.7%).
Disability Metric | Tohono O'odham | Latvian |
Disability | Tragic 14.8% | Excellent 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.2% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 36.0% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.7% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 2.3% |