Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,035,532 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.332. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.038% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 37.7 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $53,806, a difference of 77.8%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $125,150, a difference of 73.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($69,068 compared to $118,056, a difference of 70.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 22.2%), householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $57,123, a difference of 26.2%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $46,502, a difference of 40.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 164.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (31.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 141.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (31.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 136.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 47.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 49.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 56.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 98.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 94.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 92.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 14.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 102.4%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 99.1%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 79.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (67.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.53 compared to 3.22, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 15.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.11%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 130.7%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 114.6%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 103.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.020%), 4th grade (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and 3rd grade (97.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 114.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 90.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 77.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 14.6%), disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 22.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 30.6%).