Tohono O'odham vs Asian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Asian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Asians

Tragic
Excellent
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,712
SOCIAL INDEX
84.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
56th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Asian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,568,185 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.400. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.168% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 167.6 Asians.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Asian Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Asian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Asian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($72,193 compared to $119,955, a difference of 66.2%), per capita income ($30,256 compared to $50,057, a difference of 65.4%), and median household income ($61,663 compared to $101,681, a difference of 64.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 21.6%), householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $57,003, a difference of 26.0%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $44,586, a difference of 34.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Asian Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamAsian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Exceptional
$50,057
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Exceptional
$119,955
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Exceptional
$101,681
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Exceptional
$53,690
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Exceptional
$63,827
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Exceptional
$44,586
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Exceptional
$57,003
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Exceptional
$112,666
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Exceptional
$118,426
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Exceptional
$68,822
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
26.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Asian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Asian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 163.9%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 140.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (31.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 135.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 51.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 59.4%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 65.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Asian Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamAsian
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
18.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Exceptional
14.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
13.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
13.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
26.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
9.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Asian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Asian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 99.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 97.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 92.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 20.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Asian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamAsian
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Good
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
5.1%

Tohono O'odham vs Asian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 14.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 9.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Asian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamAsian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
83.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Asian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Asian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 86.1%), single father households (3.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 82.1%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 63.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.1% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.94%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and average family size (3.53 compared to 3.28, a difference of 7.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Asian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamAsian
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
66.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
29.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
49.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Exceptional
3.28
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
26.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Asian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 74.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 10.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Asian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamAsian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
91.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Exceptional
57.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
20.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Asian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Asian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 93.6%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 90.0%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 81.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.050%), 6th grade (96.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and 4th grade (97.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
Tohono O'odham vs Asian Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamAsian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
96.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Tragic
96.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Tragic
95.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Tragic
95.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Tragic
94.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Average
92.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Good
91.4%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Good
89.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
69.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
52.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
44.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
18.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
5.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Asian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 101.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 78.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 68.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 15.0%), disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 20.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 25.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Asian Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamAsian
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Excellent
46.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.3%