Tohono O'odham vs Scotch-Irish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Scotch-Irish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Scotch-Irish

Tragic
Average
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,433
SOCIAL INDEX
51.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
176th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Scotch-Irish Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,491,181 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.051. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Scotch-Irish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 2.7 Scotch-Irish.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Scotch-Irish Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Scotch-Irish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $42,563, a difference of 40.7%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $99,591, a difference of 38.0%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $53,658, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $49,039, a difference of 8.4%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $37,383, a difference of 12.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $59,447, a difference of 21.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs Scotch-Irish Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamScotch-Irish
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Fair
$42,563
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Poor
$99,591
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Tragic
$80,972
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Poor
$44,924
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Fair
$53,658
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Tragic
$37,383
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Tragic
$49,039
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Tragic
$89,969
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Poor
$97,073
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Poor
$59,447
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
28.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Scotch-Irish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 148.6%), family poverty (20.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 138.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (20.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 119.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 18.6%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 36.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 43.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Scotch-Irish Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamScotch-Irish
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Good
12.2%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Excellent
8.6%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Good
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Tragic
14.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Tragic
18.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Average
16.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Average
16.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Fair
16.7%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
14.7%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Tragic
22.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
18.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
31.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
10.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Scotch-Irish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 107.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 101.7%), and unemployment (8.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 86.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 10.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs Scotch-Irish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamScotch-Irish
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
8.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Excellent
5.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Scotch-Irish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 32.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 8.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Scotch-Irish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamScotch-Irish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Tragic
63.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Tragic
78.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
41.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Tragic
81.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Scotch-Irish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 66.0%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 51.0%), and births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 4.3%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Scotch-Irish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamScotch-Irish
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Average
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
48.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
48.7%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Poor
33.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Scotch-Irish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 129.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 21.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 10.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 19.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Scotch-Irish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamScotch-Irish
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
6.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
93.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Exceptional
60.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Scotch-Irish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 59.3%), professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 51.1%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.75%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.77%).
Tohono O'odham vs Scotch-Irish Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamScotch-Irish
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
95.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
92.4%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
86.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Average
65.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Fair
58.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Fair
45.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Poor
36.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Fair
14.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Scotch-Irish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 47.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 29.2%), and disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 7.1%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 8.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Scotch-Irish Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamScotch-Irish
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
13.3%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Tragic
24.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Average
47.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Excellent
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.6%