Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Tragic
Fair
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,209,299 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.998. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.042% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 42.4 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $39,827, a difference of 31.6%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $94,472, a difference of 30.9%), and median household income ($61,663 compared to $78,682, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $48,749, a difference of 7.7%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $38,028, a difference of 14.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Tragic
$39,827
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Tragic
$94,472
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Tragic
$78,682
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Tragic
$43,998
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Tragic
$50,298
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Tragic
$38,028
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Tragic
$48,749
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Tragic
$86,736
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Tragic
$91,385
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Tragic
$57,114
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Exceptional
22.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 93.7%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 86.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (20.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 85.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 33.7%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 40.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 43.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
14.2%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
10.5%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
15.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Tragic
20.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
19.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
19.7%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Fair
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
12.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 110.7%), male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 95.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 94.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 12.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 24.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 29.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
15.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Good
5.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 24.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 15.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 9.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
39.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Exceptional
76.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Tragic
82.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 57.8%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 51.6%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.010%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (67.1% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 7.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
62.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Tragic
43.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Tragic
44.3%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Poor
32.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 50.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.20%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Fair
6.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 45.3%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 39.3%), and professional degree (2.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (94.5% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.38%), 9th grade (92.6% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and 7th grade (95.0% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.56%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
96.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Tragic
93.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Tragic
91.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Tragic
90.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
86.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
83.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Tragic
62.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Tragic
56.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Tragic
43.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
35.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
13.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Poor
1.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 94.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 50.0%), and ambulatory disability (8.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Average
2.5%