Tohono O'odham vs Swiss Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Swiss
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Swiss

Tragic
Good
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,517
SOCIAL INDEX
72.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
114th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Swiss Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,393,568 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.624. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 2.1 Swiss.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Swiss Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Swiss Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $44,076, a difference of 45.7%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $104,396, a difference of 44.6%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $55,731, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $51,493, a difference of 13.8%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $37,904, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $61,621, a difference of 25.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Swiss Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamSwiss
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Good
$44,076
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Good
$104,396
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Average
$85,681
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Average
$46,315
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Good
$55,731
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Tragic
$37,904
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Poor
$51,493
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Good
$95,511
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Good
$103,071
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Good
$61,621
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
30.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Swiss Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 164.3%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 161.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (20.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 126.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 27.5%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 44.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 53.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Swiss Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamSwiss
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
12.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Good
13.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Exceptional
16.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
14.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Fair
21.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
9.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Swiss Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 115.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 106.5%), and unemployment (8.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 95.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Swiss Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamSwiss
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
15.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Swiss Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 38.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 13.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 10.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Swiss Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamSwiss
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Tragic
64.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
43.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Exceptional
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Poor
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Average
82.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Swiss Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 66.6%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 63.6%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 62.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.12%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (67.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Swiss Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamSwiss
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
49.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
49.7%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Excellent
30.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Swiss Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 98.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 22.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 9.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 21.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Swiss Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamSwiss
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Exceptional
61.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Swiss Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 57.4%), bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 52.4%), and master's degree (9.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.69%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.70%).
Tohono O'odham vs Swiss Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamSwiss
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
97.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
87.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Average
65.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Average
59.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Average
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Fair
37.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Average
14.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Excellent
2.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Swiss Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 57.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 44.3%), and ambulatory disability (8.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.3%), and cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 15.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Swiss Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamSwiss
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Poor
11.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Good
22.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.4%