Tohono O'odham vs Danish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Danish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Danes

Tragic
Excellent
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,781
SOCIAL INDEX
85.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
48th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Danish Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,090,954 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Danes within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.584. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.088% in Danes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 88.4 Danes.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Danish Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Danish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Danish communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($72,193 compared to $105,900, a difference of 46.7%), per capita income ($30,256 compared to $44,095, a difference of 45.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,774 compared to $105,619, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $37,730, a difference of 13.6%), householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $53,041, a difference of 17.2%), and median earnings ($36,349 compared to $46,392, a difference of 27.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Danish Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamDanish
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Good
$44,095
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Excellent
$105,900
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Excellent
$87,676
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Average
$46,392
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Excellent
$56,246
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Tragic
$37,730
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Excellent
$53,041
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Excellent
$97,221
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Exceptional
$105,619
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Exceptional
$63,117
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
31.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Danish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Danish communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 179.4%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 170.7%), and receiving food stamps (21.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 137.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 39.5%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 51.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 56.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Danish Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamDanish
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
11.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
13.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Average
12.8%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Good
20.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
8.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
9.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Danish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Danish communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 126.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 116.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 105.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 11.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Danish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamDanish
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
15.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
9.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Danish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Danish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 42.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 10.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Danish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamDanish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Good
65.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Exceptional
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
44.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Fair
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
83.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Danish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Danish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 73.7%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 65.1%), and single father households (3.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 63.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (67.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 2.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Danish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamDanish
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
66.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
28.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
51.1%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Tragic
3.17
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
50.5%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
28.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Danish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Danish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 137.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 31.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 10.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 26.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 29.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Danish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamDanish
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
6.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
93.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Exceptional
63.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
24.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
8.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Danish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Danish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 57.9%), bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 55.8%), and professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.75%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.77%).
Tohono O'odham vs Danish Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamDanish
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
97.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
96.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
95.7%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
93.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
91.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
88.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
68.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
61.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Good
47.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Average
38.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Fair
14.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Danish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Danish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 58.3%), ambulatory disability (8.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 49.4%), and disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.9%), and cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 15.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Danish Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamDanish
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Excellent
22.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.3%