Tohono O'odham vs Norwegian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Norwegian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Norwegians

Tragic
Excellent
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,521
SOCIAL INDEX
82.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
68th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Norwegian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,373,043 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.177. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 23.7 Norwegians.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Norwegian Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Norwegian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($72,193 compared to $106,144, a difference of 47.0%), per capita income ($30,256 compared to $44,480, a difference of 47.0%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $55,965, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $38,802, a difference of 16.9%), householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $53,127, a difference of 17.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $61,104, a difference of 24.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Norwegian Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamNorwegian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Good
$44,480
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Excellent
$106,144
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Good
$86,084
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Good
$46,865
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Excellent
$55,965
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Poor
$38,802
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Exceptional
$53,127
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Good
$96,866
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Excellent
$103,682
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Average
$61,104
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
29.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Norwegian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 202.0%), family poverty (20.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 196.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (31.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 144.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 38.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 49.6%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 51.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Norwegian Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamNorwegian
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
6.9%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
11.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Exceptional
14.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
13.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
13.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
13.3%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
3.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
8.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
9.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Norwegian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 129.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 121.4%), and unemployment (8.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 111.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 10.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Norwegian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamNorwegian
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
14.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
9.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Norwegian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 47.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 16.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 12.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Norwegian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamNorwegian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
46.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
84.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Norwegian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 69.9%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 67.1%), and single father households (3.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 58.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.98%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (67.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 5.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Norwegian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamNorwegian
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
49.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Tragic
3.08
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
50.2%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
29.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Norwegian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 142.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 26.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 10.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 20.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 25.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Norwegian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamNorwegian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
6.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
93.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Exceptional
62.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
8.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Norwegian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 71.5%), bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 53.4%), and associate's degree (31.8% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.87%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.87%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.89%).
Tohono O'odham vs Norwegian Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamNorwegian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.3%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.7%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.7%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.7%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
96.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
96.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
95.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
94.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
92.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
68.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
61.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Excellent
47.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Average
37.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Average
1.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Norwegian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 60.3%), ambulatory disability (8.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 47.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 4.6%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 12.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Norwegian Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamNorwegian
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Fair
11.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Exceptional
22.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
45.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.3%