Tohono O'odham vs Thai Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Thai
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Thais

Tragic
Exceptional
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,191
SOCIAL INDEX
99.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
2nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Thai Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,571,990 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Thais within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.224. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.072% in Thais. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 71.6 Thais.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Thai Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Thai Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Thai communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $72,135, a difference of 82.4%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $131,281, a difference of 81.9%), and per capita income ($30,256 compared to $54,307, a difference of 79.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $59,187, a difference of 30.8%), wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 37.6%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $47,577, a difference of 43.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Thai Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamThai
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Exceptional
$54,307
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Exceptional
$131,281
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Exceptional
$110,648
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Exceptional
$59,237
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Exceptional
$72,135
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Exceptional
$47,577
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Exceptional
$59,187
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Exceptional
$121,778
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Exceptional
$129,560
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Exceptional
$72,099
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
30.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Thai Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Thai communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 205.0%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 186.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (31.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 174.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 51.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 75.1%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 75.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Thai Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamThai
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
9.6%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
6.7%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
17.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Exceptional
12.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
11.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
11.8%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Exceptional
17.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
14.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
24.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
10.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
8.1%

Tohono O'odham vs Thai Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Thai communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 121.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 114.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 108.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Thai Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamThai
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
15.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
6.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Thai Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Thai communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 17.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 14.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 10.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Thai Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamThai
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
67.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Exceptional
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
34.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Tragic
74.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
84.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Thai Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Thai communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 107.5%), single father households (3.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 98.8%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 74.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.1% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and average family size (3.53 compared to 3.22, a difference of 9.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Thai Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamThai
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
67.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
30.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
51.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
50.9%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
10.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
24.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Thai Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Thai communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 90.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 15.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 5.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 8.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Thai Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamThai
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Exceptional
57.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Good
19.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Fair
6.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Thai Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Thai communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 123.7%), professional degree (2.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 115.9%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 105.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.31%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.32%).
Tohono O'odham vs Thai Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamThai
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
91.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
89.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
73.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
68.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
57.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
50.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
21.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Thai Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Thai communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 106.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 95.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 79.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 19.5%), disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 24.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Thai Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamThai
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
9.7%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
9.2%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Exceptional
20.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
45.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
1.7%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
16.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.1%