Tohono O'odham vs Jordanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Jordanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Jordanians

Tragic
Exceptional
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,589
SOCIAL INDEX
93.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
11th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Jordanian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,125,523 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Jordanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 6.1 Jordanians.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Jordanian Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Jordanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($72,193 compared to $109,865, a difference of 52.2%), per capita income ($30,256 compared to $45,605, a difference of 50.7%), and median household income ($61,663 compared to $91,794, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $51,796, a difference of 14.5%), wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 21.0%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $41,464, a difference of 24.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Jordanian Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamJordanian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Excellent
$45,605
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Exceptional
$109,865
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Exceptional
$91,794
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Exceptional
$49,632
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Exceptional
$58,500
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Exceptional
$41,464
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Fair
$51,796
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Exceptional
$99,186
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Exceptional
$109,376
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Exceptional
$64,313
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
26.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Jordanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 150.2%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 132.6%), and male poverty (22.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 119.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 36.7%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 62.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 64.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Jordanian Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamJordanian
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
18.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
15.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
26.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
10.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Jordanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 109.6%), male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 105.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 96.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs Jordanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamJordanian
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Average
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Good
5.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Jordanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 15.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 10.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Jordanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamJordanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Fair
36.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
83.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Jordanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 74.8%), single father households (3.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 74.6%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.4%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Jordanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamJordanian
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
65.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
29.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
48.0%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
28.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Jordanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 83.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 15.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.87%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 7.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Jordanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamJordanian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
8.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Exceptional
57.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Excellent
6.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Jordanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 70.1%), bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 68.5%), and professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 66.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.17%).
Tohono O'odham vs Jordanian Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamJordanian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Excellent
2.0%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Excellent
96.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
95.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
92.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
90.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
87.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
68.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
49.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
41.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
16.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Excellent
4.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Jordanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 94.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 65.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 62.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 14.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.1%), and disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 23.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Jordanian Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamJordanian
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Exceptional
22.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.3%