Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Cabo Verde Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 17,646,457 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cabo Verde within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Cabo Verde. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 1.3 Immigrants from Cabo Verde.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $38,540, a difference of 27.4%), median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $50,009, a difference of 26.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($69,068 compared to $84,304, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $46,654, a difference of 5.3%), wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $50,520, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 110.1%), family poverty (20.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 75.9%), and male poverty (22.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 66.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.5%), receiving food stamps (21.5% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 11.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (20.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 28.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (10.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 89.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 77.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 68.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 42.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 17.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 23.8%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 18.1%), and average family size (3.53 compared to 3.20, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.4%), currently married (36.8% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and married-couple households (37.9% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 74.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 39.0%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 15.4%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 52.8%), bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 19.8%), and master's degree (9.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (87.6% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 0.060%), 10th grade (90.1% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and 12th grade, no diploma (84.7% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 40.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 36.9%), and disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (3.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 2.0%), female disability (15.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 3.1%).