Tohono O'odham vs Slavic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Slavic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Slavs

Tragic
Good
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Slavic Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,608,336 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.339. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.036% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 35.6 Slavs.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Slavic Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Slavic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $45,049, a difference of 48.9%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $105,144, a difference of 45.6%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $56,390, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $50,563, a difference of 11.7%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $39,613, a difference of 19.3%), and wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 23.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Slavic Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamSlavic
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Excellent
$45,049
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Good
$105,144
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Good
$86,398
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Excellent
$47,470
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Excellent
$56,390
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Average
$39,613
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Tragic
$50,563
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Good
$96,377
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Good
$102,629
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Good
$61,709
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
27.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Slavic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 152.4%), family poverty (20.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 151.8%), and male poverty (22.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 117.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 26.8%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 45.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 57.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Slavic Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamSlavic
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
11.5%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Good
17.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Excellent
15.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Excellent
15.7%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
17.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Fair
29.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
10.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Slavic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 100.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 96.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 84.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 18.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs Slavic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamSlavic
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Excellent
5.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Slavic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 29.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 14.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 9.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 10.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Slavic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamSlavic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Tragic
64.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Average
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Exceptional
76.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Good
82.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Slavic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 70.0%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 57.7%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 55.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and family households (67.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 4.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Slavic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamSlavic
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Poor
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Excellent
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Average
31.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Slavic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 74.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 15.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.95%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 8.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Slavic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamSlavic
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
91.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
20.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Excellent
6.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Slavic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 59.8%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 59.7%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.54%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.55%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.55%).
Tohono O'odham vs Slavic Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamSlavic
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
95.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
91.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
87.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Excellent
66.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Excellent
47.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Good
38.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Slavic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 56.9%), disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 55.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 15.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Slavic Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamSlavic
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Fair
2.5%