Tohono O'odham vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Zimbabweans

Tragic
Exceptional
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,875,354 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 12.9 Zimbabweans.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($72,193 compared to $110,011, a difference of 52.4%), per capita income ($30,256 compared to $45,804, a difference of 51.4%), and median household income ($61,663 compared to $90,618, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $51,259, a difference of 13.3%), wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 18.8%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $40,798, a difference of 22.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Fair
26.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 175.0%), family poverty (20.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 161.5%), and receiving food stamps (21.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 126.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 41.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 51.8%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 54.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamZimbabwean
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
9.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 120.2%), male unemployment (10.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 112.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 103.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamZimbabwean
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
5.1%

Tohono O'odham vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 23.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 17.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 10.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
84.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 73.8%), single father households (3.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 72.9%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.34%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households (67.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 4.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamZimbabwean
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
28.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 72.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 14.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Good
6.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 82.6%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 82.6%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 77.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.42%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.44%).
Tohono O'odham vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 85.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 67.2%), and ambulatory disability (8.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 61.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 9.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamZimbabwean
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.2%