Tohono O'odham vs Ugandan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ugandan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Ugandans

Tragic
Average
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,220
SOCIAL INDEX
59.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
159th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ugandan Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,076,393 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.975. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 16.4 Ugandans.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Ugandan Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Ugandan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $45,047, a difference of 48.9%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $106,541, a difference of 47.6%), and median household income ($61,663 compared to $87,557, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 8.6%), householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $50,923, a difference of 12.5%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $40,889, a difference of 23.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Ugandan Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamUgandan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Excellent
$45,047
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Excellent
$106,541
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Excellent
$87,557
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Excellent
$47,854
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Good
$55,290
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Exceptional
$40,889
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Tragic
$50,923
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Good
$96,667
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Excellent
$103,472
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Average
$61,177
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Exceptional
24.1%

Tohono O'odham vs Ugandan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 119.9%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 110.3%), and male poverty (22.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 87.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 35.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 40.4%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 49.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Ugandan Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamUgandan
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Fair
9.3%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Poor
14.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
22.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Good
13.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Poor
18.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Poor
17.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Poor
17.2%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Good
28.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Poor
11.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Good
11.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Fair
12.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Ugandan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 102.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 100.3%), and male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 84.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 18.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Ugandan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamUgandan
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Good
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
12.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
5.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Ugandan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 24.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 17.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 10.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Ugandan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamUgandan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
67.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Exceptional
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Good
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
83.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Ugandan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 65.7%), single father households (3.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 65.0%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (67.1% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 8.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Ugandan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamUgandan
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
61.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Tragic
43.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Fair
6.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Tragic
44.2%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Excellent
30.1%

Tohono O'odham vs Ugandan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 36.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 4.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 7.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs Ugandan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamUgandan
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
11.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
88.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Tragic
53.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
5.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Ugandan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 79.7%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 76.5%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 67.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.11%).
Tohono O'odham vs Ugandan Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamUgandan
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Average
97.6%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Average
97.4%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Good
96.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Good
95.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Good
95.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Excellent
94.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Good
86.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
61.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
48.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
17.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Ugandan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 92.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 58.5%), and ambulatory disability (8.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 52.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 4.9%), cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Ugandan Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamUgandan
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Excellent
22.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.3%