Tohono O'odham vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Celtics

Tragic
Average
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,502,922 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.041. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 1.6 Celtics.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Celtic Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $43,621, a difference of 44.2%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $101,139, a difference of 40.1%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $54,242, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $50,447, a difference of 11.5%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $38,283, a difference of 15.3%), and wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 23.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Celtic Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamCeltic
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
27.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 134.8%), family poverty (20.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 131.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (20.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 112.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 19.1%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 39.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 43.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamCeltic
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Average
12.3%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Good
8.8%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Excellent
10.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 103.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 99.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 82.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamCeltic
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Good
5.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 32.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 13.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 9.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamCeltic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Tragic
81.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 64.2%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 49.7%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 5.2%), family households (67.1% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 7.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamCeltic
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Poor
33.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 93.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 18.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 14.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamCeltic
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.1%

Tohono O'odham vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 54.3%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 52.0%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 51.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.59%).
Tohono O'odham vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamCeltic
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 48.6%), disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 30.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 11.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamCeltic
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.6%