Tohono O'odham vs Mongolian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Mongolian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Mongolians

Tragic
Good
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,008
SOCIAL INDEX
77.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
93rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Mongolian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,444,514 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 12.1 Mongolians.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Mongolian Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Mongolian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $49,173, a difference of 62.5%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $114,553, a difference of 58.7%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $60,350, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $52,540, a difference of 16.1%), wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 20.3%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $42,542, a difference of 28.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Mongolian Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamMongolian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Exceptional
$49,173
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Exceptional
$114,553
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Exceptional
$93,971
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Exceptional
$51,038
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Exceptional
$60,350
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Exceptional
$42,542
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Good
$52,540
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Exceptional
$104,578
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Exceptional
$111,602
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Exceptional
$65,326
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Poor
26.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Mongolian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 137.4%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 123.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (31.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 109.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 43.5%), single father poverty (22.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 44.3%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 55.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Mongolian Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamMongolian
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Average
12.4%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Excellent
8.6%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Fair
11.3%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Exceptional
16.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Excellent
15.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
15.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Excellent
15.4%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Exceptional
20.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
27.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Average
12.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
10.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Mongolian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 102.8%), male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 97.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 96.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Mongolian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamMongolian
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Average
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Excellent
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
5.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Mongolian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 9.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Mongolian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamMongolian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Exceptional
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
35.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
83.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Mongolian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 86.3%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 78.6%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.5%), family households (67.1% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 8.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Mongolian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamMongolian
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
62.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
27.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Mongolian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 19.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 2.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 5.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Mongolian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamMongolian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
13.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
87.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Tragic
52.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Tragic
18.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
5.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Mongolian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 115.6%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 99.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 89.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%).
Tohono O'odham vs Mongolian Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamMongolian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Fair
97.9%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Fair
97.5%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Fair
97.3%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Average
97.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Average
95.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Good
94.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Excellent
93.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Excellent
91.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
89.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
87.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
64.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
53.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
45.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
19.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Mongolian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 90.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 65.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 65.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 8.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.0%), and disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 22.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Mongolian Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamMongolian
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Exceptional
21.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
17.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.3%