Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Ecuador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Immigrants from Ecuador

Tragic
Poor
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,727,949 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.875. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.185% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 185.3 Immigrants from Ecuador.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $41,195, a difference of 36.2%), median household income ($61,663 compared to $80,341, a difference of 30.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($69,068 compared to $89,673, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $54,030, a difference of 10.0%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $38,644, a difference of 16.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Ecuador
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Tragic
$41,195
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Tragic
$92,837
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Tragic
$80,341
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Tragic
$44,462
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Tragic
$50,474
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Poor
$38,644
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Exceptional
$53,722
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Tragic
$89,673
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Tragic
$91,462
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Tragic
$54,030
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Exceptional
22.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 83.5%), male poverty (22.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 77.1%), and single male poverty (21.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 71.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 18.7%), single father poverty (22.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 35.0%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 37.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Ecuador
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
14.3%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
11.1%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Tragic
14.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Tragic
19.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
19.3%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
31.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
14.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
15.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 63.9%), male unemployment (10.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 63.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 62.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Ecuador
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Tragic
20.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
6.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 8.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Ecuador
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
31.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Tragic
82.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 58.5%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 47.7%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.1%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (67.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 3.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Ecuador
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
64.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Tragic
42.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Excellent
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Tragic
33.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 56.5%), no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 52.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 11.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 23.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 40.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Ecuador
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
23.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
76.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Tragic
40.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Tragic
13.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
4.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 42.2%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 40.0%), and professional degree (2.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (90.1% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.33%), 9th grade (92.6% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.86%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.98%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Ecuador
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
95.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Tragic
95.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Tragic
93.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Tragic
93.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Tragic
91.8%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Tragic
90.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Tragic
89.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
87.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
84.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
81.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Tragic
58.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Tragic
53.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Tragic
42.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
34.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
13.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 95.3%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 68.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 56.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 12.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.2%), and disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 19.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Ecuador
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.6%