Tohono O'odham vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Indian (Asian)
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Indians (Asian)

Tragic
Good
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,850
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
101st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Indian (Asian) Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,949,610 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.043. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 8.1 Indians (Asian).
Tohono O'odham Integration in Indian (Asian) Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Indian (Asian) Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $53,874, a difference of 78.1%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $125,312, a difference of 73.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($69,068 compared to $119,496, a difference of 73.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 19.4%), householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $58,239, a difference of 28.7%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $46,481, a difference of 40.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs Indian (Asian) Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamIndian (Asian)
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Exceptional
$53,874
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Exceptional
$125,312
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Exceptional
$105,262
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Exceptional
$56,253
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Exceptional
$66,078
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Exceptional
$46,481
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Exceptional
$58,239
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Exceptional
$119,496
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Exceptional
$122,343
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Exceptional
$70,238
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Poor
26.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Indian (Asian) Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 164.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (31.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 141.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (31.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 137.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 48.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 50.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 58.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Indian (Asian) Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamIndian (Asian)
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
12.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Excellent
19.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Exceptional
13.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
13.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
13.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
13.3%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Exceptional
17.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
25.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
12.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
9.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Indian (Asian) Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 95.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 92.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 91.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Indian (Asian) Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamIndian (Asian)
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Good
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Average
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Average
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
6.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Indian (Asian) Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 9.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Indian (Asian) Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamIndian (Asian)
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Excellent
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
31.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Tragic
71.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
83.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Indian (Asian) Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 100.6%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 97.3%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 78.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.5%), family households (67.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and average family size (3.53 compared to 3.24, a difference of 8.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Indian (Asian) Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamIndian (Asian)
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
65.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
48.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
48.0%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
10.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
25.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Indian (Asian) Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 11.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs Indian (Asian) Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamIndian (Asian)
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
86.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Tragic
53.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Good
6.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Indian (Asian) Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 129.2%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 110.7%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 99.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.060%), 6th grade (96.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and 4th grade (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
Tohono O'odham vs Indian (Asian) Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamIndian (Asian)
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
96.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Tragic
96.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Tragic
95.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Tragic
95.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Tragic
94.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Average
92.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Good
89.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
70.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
66.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
54.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
47.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
20.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
6.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Indian (Asian) Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 118.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 89.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 75.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 14.4%), disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 21.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 31.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Indian (Asian) Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamIndian (Asian)
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.3%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
8.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Exceptional
20.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.3%