Tohono O'odham vs European Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
European
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Europeans

Tragic
Good
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,117
SOCIAL INDEX
78.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
87th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

European Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,591,074 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.265. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 29.8 Europeans.
Tohono O'odham Integration in European Communities

Tohono O'odham vs European Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and European communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $45,836, a difference of 51.5%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $108,099, a difference of 49.7%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $57,637, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $51,796, a difference of 14.5%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $39,457, a difference of 18.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $63,779, a difference of 29.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs European Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamEuropean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Exceptional
$45,836
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Exceptional
$108,099
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Exceptional
$88,751
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Excellent
$47,915
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Exceptional
$57,637
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Fair
$39,457
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Fair
$51,796
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Excellent
$98,310
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Exceptional
$106,367
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Exceptional
$63,779
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
29.4%

Tohono O'odham vs European Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and European communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 165.7%), family poverty (20.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 163.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (20.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 127.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 32.3%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 48.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 51.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs European Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamEuropean
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Poor
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Exceptional
15.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
14.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Average
29.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
9.5%

Tohono O'odham vs European Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and European communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 113.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 106.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 96.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs European Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamEuropean
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
16.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.9%

Tohono O'odham vs European Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 31.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 10.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs European Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamEuropean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
41.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Fair
82.6%

Tohono O'odham vs European Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and European communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 68.0%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 64.9%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 59.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.37%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (67.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs European Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamEuropean
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
49.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Excellent
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Excellent
30.2%

Tohono O'odham vs European Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 119.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 22.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 9.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 14.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 21.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs European Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamEuropean
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
7.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
93.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Exceptional
61.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
22.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.6%

Tohono O'odham vs European Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and European communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 69.5%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 62.8%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 61.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.72%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.72%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.73%).
Tohono O'odham vs European Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamEuropean
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
97.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
93.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
91.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
61.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Excellent
48.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Excellent
39.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Excellent
15.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.1%

Tohono O'odham vs European Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and European communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 55.4%), disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 43.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.1%), and cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 13.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs European Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamEuropean
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.3%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Good
23.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
46.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.4%