Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Immigrants from Chile

Tragic
Good
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Chile Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,305,556 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.669. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.155% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 154.8 Immigrants from Chile.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Chile Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $46,213, a difference of 52.7%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $105,655, a difference of 46.4%), and median household income ($61,663 compared to $88,388, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $52,440, a difference of 15.9%), wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 16.1%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $40,353, a difference of 21.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Chile Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Chile
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Exceptional
$46,213
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Excellent
$105,655
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Excellent
$88,388
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Excellent
$47,697
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Excellent
$55,954
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Good
$40,353
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Good
$52,440
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Excellent
$97,159
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Excellent
$103,412
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Excellent
$62,354
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Average
25.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 129.4%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 112.2%), and male poverty (22.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 106.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 40.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 44.4%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 51.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Chile
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Average
12.2%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Average
8.9%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Average
11.1%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Good
15.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Good
15.9%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
11.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
13.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Good
11.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 99.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 97.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 90.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 19.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Chile
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Average
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Tragic
18.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Good
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Fair
5.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 14.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 9.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Chile
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
34.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
83.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 74.3%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 59.8%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.75%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (67.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 4.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Chile
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Good
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Average
46.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Good
31.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 42.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.19%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 8.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Chile
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Poor
89.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Poor
54.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Poor
6.1%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 85.0%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 72.8%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 67.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%), 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.020%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.030%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Chile
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Poor
97.4%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Poor
97.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Average
85.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
49.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
16.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.1%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Chile Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 70.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 65.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 63.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 13.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Chile Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Chile
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.4%