Tohono O'odham vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,722,331 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.356. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.398% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 398.1 Whites/Caucasians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $42,180, a difference of 39.4%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $99,800, a difference of 38.2%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $53,925, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $50,336, a difference of 11.2%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $37,531, a difference of 13.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $58,847, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 132.6%), family poverty (20.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 132.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (20.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 107.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.9%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 38.0%), and single male poverty (21.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 48.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 102.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 97.9%), and unemployment (8.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 82.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 32.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 12.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 59.9%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 49.9%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.0%), family households (67.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 122.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 21.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 9.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 44.5%), professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 43.2%), and master's degree (9.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 48.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 32.7%), and disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 13.0%).