Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Cuba
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Immigrants from Cuba

Tragic
Fair
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,627
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
214th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Cuba Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,461,653 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.576. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.040% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 39.7 Immigrants from Cuba.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Immigrants from Cuba Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Cuba Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $34,910, a difference of 15.4%), householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $50,374, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($69,068 compared to $76,701, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $33,291, a difference of 0.26%), wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 0.94%), and median earnings ($36,349 compared to $38,426, a difference of 5.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Cuba Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Cuba
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Tragic
$34,910
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Tragic
$78,249
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Tragic
$68,461
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Tragic
$38,426
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Tragic
$43,461
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Tragic
$33,291
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Tragic
$50,374
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Tragic
$76,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Tragic
$80,662
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Tragic
$44,735
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Exceptional
22.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Cuba Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 88.8%), family poverty (20.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 80.2%), and male poverty (22.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 77.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (21.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 3.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (20.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 16.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Cuba Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Cuba
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
14.6%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
11.3%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
16.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
16.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Tragic
19.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Tragic
18.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
18.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Fair
21.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Average
16.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
30.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
7.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
17.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
19.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
20.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Cuba Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 129.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 128.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 113.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 16.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 30.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Cuba Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Cuba
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
5.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Cuba Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 7.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Cuba Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Cuba
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
30.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Tragic
72.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
83.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Cuba Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 43.6%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 26.8%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.1% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and average family size (3.53 compared to 3.26, a difference of 8.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Cuba Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Cuba
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
68.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Tragic
44.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Exceptional
3.26
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
7.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Tragic
43.7%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
15.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Tragic
41.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Cuba Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 79.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 16.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.56%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 7.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 10.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Cuba Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Cuba
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
8.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
91.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Average
55.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
5.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Cuba Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 26.3%), associate's degree (31.8% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 24.4%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (90.1% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.10%), 9th grade (92.6% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.71%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Cuba Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Cuba
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
97.2%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
97.1%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
97.1%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
97.0%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Tragic
96.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
96.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Tragic
95.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Tragic
93.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Tragic
93.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Tragic
92.2%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Tragic
90.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Tragic
88.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
87.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
83.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
80.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Tragic
55.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Tragic
50.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Tragic
39.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
30.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
10.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Cuba Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 91.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 73.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.7%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.4%), and cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 17.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Cuba Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Cuba
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.9%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Fair
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Fair
47.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.8%