Tohono O'odham vs German Russian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
German Russian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

German Russians

Tragic
Average
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,821
SOCIAL INDEX
45.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
192nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

German Russian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,860,171 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of German Russians within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.891. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in German Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 4.9 German Russians.
Tohono O'odham Integration in German Russian Communities

Tohono O'odham vs German Russian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $40,266, a difference of 33.1%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $93,858, a difference of 30.0%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $49,924, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $45,673, a difference of 0.94%), wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 11.2%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $37,105, a difference of 11.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs German Russian Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamGerman Russian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Tragic
$40,266
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Tragic
$93,858
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Tragic
$75,856
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Tragic
$43,200
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Tragic
$49,924
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Tragic
$37,105
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Tragic
$45,673
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Tragic
$85,220
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Tragic
$89,398
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Tragic
$55,356
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Exceptional
24.6%

Tohono O'odham vs German Russian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 126.4%), family poverty (20.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 116.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (20.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 90.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 23.2%), single father poverty (22.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 24.5%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 37.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs German Russian Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamGerman Russian
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Poor
9.4%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
14.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
25.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Tragic
14.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Tragic
18.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Tragic
17.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Poor
17.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
13.6%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Tragic
23.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
31.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Average
12.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Average
11.8%

Tohono O'odham vs German Russian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 106.0%), male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 99.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 97.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs German Russian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamGerman Russian
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Good
5.4%

Tohono O'odham vs German Russian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 35.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 15.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 10.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs German Russian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamGerman Russian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
42.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Exceptional
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Good
82.8%

Tohono O'odham vs German Russian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 60.4%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 50.7%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and family households (67.1% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 10.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs German Russian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamGerman Russian
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
60.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Tragic
44.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Poor
6.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Tragic
45.5%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Poor
33.1%

Tohono O'odham vs German Russian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 48.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 11.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 8.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs German Russian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamGerman Russian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Average
10.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Good
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
20.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.0%

Tohono O'odham vs German Russian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 46.7%), associate's degree (31.8% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 41.9%), and professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.37%).
Tohono O'odham vs German Russian Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamGerman Russian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
93.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Excellent
91.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
90.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Good
86.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Average
65.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Fair
59.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Poor
45.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Poor
35.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
13.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Fair
1.8%

Tohono O'odham vs German Russian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 47.4%), ambulatory disability (8.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 38.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.94%), cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs German Russian Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamGerman Russian
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.3%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Tragic
24.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Average
47.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
6.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Good
2.5%