Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Nepal Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Nepal
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Immigrants from Nepal

Tragic
Good
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,773
SOCIAL INDEX
75.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
106th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Nepal Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,038,938 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.674. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Immigrants from Nepal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 33.1 Immigrants from Nepal.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Immigrants from Nepal Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Nepal Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $44,187, a difference of 46.0%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $104,966, a difference of 45.4%), and median household income ($61,663 compared to $87,046, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 12.3%), householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $52,611, a difference of 16.3%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $40,704, a difference of 22.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Nepal Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Nepal
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Good
$44,187
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Good
$104,966
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Good
$87,046
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Excellent
$47,925
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Good
$55,615
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Excellent
$40,704
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Good
$52,611
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Good
$95,322
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Good
$102,190
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Good
$61,843
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Excellent
24.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Nepal Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 139.6%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 136.6%), and male poverty (22.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 108.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 48.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 50.1%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 54.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Nepal Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Nepal
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Good
12.2%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Good
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Excellent
16.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Good
15.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Good
15.9%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Exceptional
20.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
10.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Nepal Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 110.5%), male unemployment (10.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 110.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 110.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 22.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 27.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Nepal Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Nepal
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
5.1%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Nepal Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 22.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 18.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 10.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Nepal Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Nepal
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
68.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Exceptional
81.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Exceptional
76.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
84.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Nepal Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 71.3%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 68.6%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.5%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households (67.1% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 7.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Nepal Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Nepal
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
62.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Poor
3.21
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Fair
46.1%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
29.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Nepal Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 48.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 5.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 7.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Nepal Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Nepal
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Average
10.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Fair
89.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Tragic
53.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Tragic
17.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
5.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Nepal Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 74.7%), bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 70.8%), and professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 68.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 3rd grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and 5th grade (97.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Nepal Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Nepal
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Fair
94.8%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Average
93.7%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Average
91.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Good
86.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
67.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
62.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
49.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
41.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
17.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Nepal Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 109.5%), ambulatory disability (8.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 61.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 59.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 6.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Nepal Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Nepal
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Excellent
22.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.2%