Tohono O'odham vs Osage Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Osage
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Osage

Tragic
Fair
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Osage Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,828,219 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Osage within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.068. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 3.1 Osage.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Osage Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Osage Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Osage communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $39,568, a difference of 30.8%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $91,926, a difference of 27.3%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $50,292, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $45,764, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $36,034, a difference of 8.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $55,677, a difference of 13.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Osage Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamOsage
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Tragic
$39,568
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Tragic
$91,926
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Tragic
$75,240
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Tragic
$42,651
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Tragic
$50,292
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Tragic
$36,034
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Tragic
$45,764
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Tragic
$84,461
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Tragic
$88,390
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Tragic
$55,677
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
27.1%

Tohono O'odham vs Osage Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Osage communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 109.7%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 106.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (20.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 97.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 15.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 26.8%), and single male poverty (21.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 30.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Osage Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamOsage
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
13.6%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
9.7%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
14.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Tragic
16.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Tragic
19.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Tragic
17.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
17.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
16.5%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Tragic
24.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
32.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Excellent
10.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Average
11.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Osage Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 92.3%), male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 91.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 81.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (10.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 7.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 19.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Osage Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamOsage
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Average
5.3%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Fair
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Good
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
5.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Osage Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 24.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 11.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 7.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Osage Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamOsage
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Tragic
63.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Tragic
78.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
39.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
82.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Tragic
82.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Tragic
80.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Osage Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Osage communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 55.5%), single father households (3.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 54.5%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (67.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and average family size (3.53 compared to 3.18, a difference of 11.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Osage Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamOsage
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
63.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Good
46.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Average
6.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Excellent
47.5%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Fair
32.1%

Tohono O'odham vs Osage Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 79.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 20.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 7.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 17.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Osage Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamOsage
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
8.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Exceptional
58.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
22.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Osage Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Osage communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 35.3%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.7%), and associate's degree (31.8% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.46%).
Tohono O'odham vs Osage Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamOsage
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Good
92.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Fair
91.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
84.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Tragic
62.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Tragic
55.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Tragic
41.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
33.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
12.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Osage Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 31.2%), self-care disability (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.6%), and disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.060%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Osage Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamOsage
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
14.2%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
14.0%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
14.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
8.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
14.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Tragic
27.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Tragic
49.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.7%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
7.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.6%