Tohono O'odham vs Yugoslavian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yugoslavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Yugoslavians

Tragic
Good
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,775
SOCIAL INDEX
65.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
143rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yugoslavian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,184,958 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.358. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Yugoslavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 13.3 Yugoslavians.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Yugoslavian Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Yugoslavian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $42,792, a difference of 41.4%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $100,119, a difference of 38.7%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $53,967, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $51,028, a difference of 12.8%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $38,573, a difference of 16.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $58,243, a difference of 18.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Yugoslavian Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamYugoslavian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Fair
$42,792
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Fair
$100,119
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Poor
$82,186
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Fair
$45,846
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Fair
$53,967
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Tragic
$38,573
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Tragic
$51,028
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Poor
$91,368
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Fair
$97,558
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Tragic
$58,243
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
26.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Yugoslavian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 141.8%), family poverty (20.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 139.1%), and male poverty (22.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 111.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 35.3%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 46.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 56.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Yugoslavian Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamYugoslavian
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Good
10.8%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Average
13.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Average
17.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Good
15.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Good
16.2%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Fair
21.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Fair
29.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
10.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Yugoslavian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 104.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 99.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 98.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 12.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 18.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Yugoslavian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamYugoslavian
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
15.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
9.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
5.1%

Tohono O'odham vs Yugoslavian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 33.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 14.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 10.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 10.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Yugoslavian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamYugoslavian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
41.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Exceptional
78.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Good
83.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Yugoslavian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 62.8%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 61.6%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.7%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households (67.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 6.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Yugoslavian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamYugoslavian
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
63.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Fair
46.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Good
47.2%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Good
30.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Yugoslavian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 73.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 13.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 4.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 7.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Yugoslavian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamYugoslavian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
91.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Average
6.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Yugoslavian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 52.0%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 48.1%), and associate's degree (31.8% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.32%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.33%).
Tohono O'odham vs Yugoslavian Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamYugoslavian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
94.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
90.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Excellent
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Average
59.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Average
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Fair
37.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Fair
14.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Poor
1.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Yugoslavian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 54.4%), disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 53.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 42.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 12.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Yugoslavian Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamYugoslavian
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Average
23.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Excellent
46.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Fair
2.5%