Tohono O'odham vs Tlingit-Haida Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tlingit-Haida
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Tlingit-Haida

Tragic
Average
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,201
SOCIAL INDEX
49.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
182nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tlingit-Haida Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,589,882 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Tlingit-Haida. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 17.3 Tlingit-Haida.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Tlingit-Haida Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Tlingit-Haida Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $43,516, a difference of 43.8%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $101,092, a difference of 40.0%), and median household income ($61,663 compared to $83,968, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 8.2%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $39,513, a difference of 19.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $55,914, a difference of 23.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Tlingit-Haida Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamTlingit-Haida
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Average
$43,516
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Fair
$101,092
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Fair
$83,968
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Fair
$45,468
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Poor
$52,409
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Average
$39,513
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Exceptional
$55,914
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Fair
$92,987
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Poor
$97,417
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Excellent
$62,922
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Exceptional
24.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Tlingit-Haida Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 156.3%), family poverty (20.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 154.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (20.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 149.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 39.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 40.8%), and single father poverty (22.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 43.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Tlingit-Haida Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamTlingit-Haida
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Good
10.9%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
22.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Fair
13.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Exceptional
15.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
14.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
9.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Average
11.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Tlingit-Haida Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 98.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 91.8%), and male unemployment (10.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 68.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 6.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Tlingit-Haida Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamTlingit-Haida
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Tragic
23.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Fair
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
20.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
8.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Good
5.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Tlingit-Haida Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 29.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 11.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Tlingit-Haida Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamTlingit-Haida
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
40.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Exceptional
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Tragic
82.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
82.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
83.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Tlingit-Haida Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 59.0%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 54.7%), and single father households (3.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 7.6%), family households (67.1% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 9.0%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 9.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Tlingit-Haida Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamTlingit-Haida
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
61.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Tragic
45.1%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Fair
32.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Tlingit-Haida Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 55.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 6.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Tlingit-Haida Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamTlingit-Haida
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Good
55.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Good
19.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
6.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Tlingit-Haida Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 59.2%), bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 41.5%), and professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.85%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.86%).
Tohono O'odham vs Tlingit-Haida Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamTlingit-Haida
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.7%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.7%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
96.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
95.7%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
91.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
87.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
34.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Poor
1.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Tlingit-Haida Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 41.8%), ambulatory disability (8.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 35.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and male disability (14.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 5.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Tlingit-Haida Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamTlingit-Haida
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
13.5%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
13.8%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Tragic
27.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Tragic
50.6%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
4.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Good
2.4%