Tohono O'odham vs Hungarian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hungarian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Hungarians

Tragic
Good
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,572
SOCIAL INDEX
63.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
149th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hungarian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,542,191 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Hungarians within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.873. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.041% in Hungarians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 40.8 Hungarians.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Hungarian Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Hungarian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $45,426, a difference of 50.1%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $105,609, a difference of 46.3%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $57,309, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $50,247, a difference of 11.1%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $39,510, a difference of 19.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $61,673, a difference of 25.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Hungarian Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamHungarian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Excellent
$45,426
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Excellent
$105,609
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Good
$86,920
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Excellent
$47,795
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Exceptional
$57,309
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Average
$39,510
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Tragic
$50,247
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Excellent
$97,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Excellent
$103,913
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Good
$61,673
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
29.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Hungarian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 131.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (20.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 114.9%), and married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 111.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 19.3%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 43.8%), and single male poverty (21.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 56.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Hungarian Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamHungarian
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Good
12.2%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Good
8.8%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Average
11.1%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Good
13.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Poor
14.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Average
16.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Average
16.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Average
16.6%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Fair
21.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Poor
29.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Excellent
11.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Hungarian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 97.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 92.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 81.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Hungarian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamHungarian
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Fair
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Average
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Excellent
5.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Hungarian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 27.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 13.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 10.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs Hungarian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamHungarian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Tragic
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
39.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Exceptional
76.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Fair
82.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Hungarian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 76.0%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 61.0%), and births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 59.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.38%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (67.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 3.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Hungarian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamHungarian
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
49.1%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Good
31.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Hungarian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 57.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 13.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 6.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Hungarian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamHungarian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Excellent
56.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Good
19.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Good
6.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Hungarian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 62.9%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 60.3%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.60%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.60%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.61%).
Tohono O'odham vs Hungarian Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamHungarian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
96.2%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
95.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
94.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Average
59.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Average
46.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Good
38.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Good
15.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Excellent
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Hungarian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 60.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 46.7%), and disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 17.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs Hungarian Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamHungarian
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
6.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Average
2.5%