Tohono O'odham vs Russian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Russian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Russians

Tragic
Excellent
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,595
SOCIAL INDEX
83.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
62nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Russian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,189,324 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Russians within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.069. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.031% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 31.1 Russians.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Russian Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Russian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $53,154, a difference of 75.7%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $120,487, a difference of 66.9%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $63,939, a difference of 61.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $54,389, a difference of 20.2%), wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 26.4%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $44,169, a difference of 33.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs Russian Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamRussian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Exceptional
$53,154
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Exceptional
$120,487
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Exceptional
$98,008
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Exceptional
$53,334
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Exceptional
$63,939
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Exceptional
$44,169
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Exceptional
$54,389
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Exceptional
$110,398
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Exceptional
$116,328
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Exceptional
$67,626
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
28.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Russian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Russian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 173.7%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 159.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (31.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 134.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 33.8%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 57.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 58.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Russian Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamRussian
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
10.9%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
7.5%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
9.9%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
11.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Exceptional
14.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
13.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
13.9%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Fair
16.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
27.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Excellent
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
9.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Russian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Russian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 99.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 92.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 89.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 19.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs Russian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamRussian
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Average
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Average
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Fair
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
5.1%

Tohono O'odham vs Russian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 14.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 10.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Russian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamRussian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Poor
64.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Average
36.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Fair
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
83.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Russian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Russian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 90.6%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 77.9%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 72.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.3%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and family households (67.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 5.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Russian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamRussian
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
26.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
48.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Tragic
3.12
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
48.6%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
28.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Russian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 34.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.10%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 9.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Russian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamRussian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
11.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Fair
54.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Poor
6.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Russian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Russian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 122.5%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 101.4%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 85.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.51%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.52%).
Tohono O'odham vs Russian Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamRussian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
97.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.7%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
95.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
94.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
91.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
70.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
65.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
53.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
45.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
19.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
6.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Russian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 70.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 64.5%), and disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 59.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.3%), cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 17.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Russian Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamRussian
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Exceptional
21.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
45.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Excellent
2.4%