Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Russia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Immigrants from Russia

Tragic
Good
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,989
SOCIAL INDEX
77.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
94th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Russia Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,379,938 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.132. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 16.5 Immigrants from Russia.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Immigrants from Russia Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Russia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $52,044, a difference of 72.0%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $116,942, a difference of 62.0%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $63,326, a difference of 60.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 19.1%), householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $55,891, a difference of 23.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $64,512, a difference of 31.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Russia Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Russia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Exceptional
$52,044
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Exceptional
$116,942
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Exceptional
$96,378
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Exceptional
$53,457
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Exceptional
$63,326
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Exceptional
$44,680
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Exceptional
$55,891
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Exceptional
$108,751
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Exceptional
$113,215
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Exceptional
$64,512
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Poor
26.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Russia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 147.8%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 123.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (31.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 119.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 42.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 42.4%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 57.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Russia Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Russia
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Excellent
10.6%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Exceptional
15.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
14.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Exceptional
19.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
13.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
10.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Russia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 92.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 91.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 83.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.83%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Russia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Russia
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Average
5.3%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Tragic
18.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Excellent
5.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Russia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 14.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 14.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 9.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Russia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Russia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Good
65.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Exceptional
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Tragic
73.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
83.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Russia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 95.4%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 83.6%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 66.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 4.7%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and family households (67.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 6.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Russia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Russia
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
63.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
47.7%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
27.1%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Russia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 0.62%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.88%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 3.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Russia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Russia
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
15.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
85.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Tragic
50.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Tragic
16.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
5.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Russia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 112.2%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 99.9%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 86.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.12%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Russia Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Russia
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Good
96.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Excellent
96.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
93.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
92.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
90.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
64.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
53.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
45.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
19.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Russia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 103.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 70.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 66.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 14.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.8%), and disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 20.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Russia Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Russia
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Exceptional
21.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Good
47.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Poor
2.5%