Immigrants from Chile vs Yup'ik Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yup'ik
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Chile

Yup'ik

Good
Fair
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,388
SOCIAL INDEX
21.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
262nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yup'ik Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,145,557 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.947. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.287% in Yup'ik. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 287.3 Yup'ik.
Immigrants from Chile Integration in Yup'ik Communities

Immigrants from Chile vs Yup'ik Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $30,518, a difference of 51.4%), median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $39,504, a difference of 41.6%), and median family income ($105,655 compared to $79,290, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $60,727, a difference of 2.7%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $54,732, a difference of 4.4%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Yup'ik Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChileYup'ik
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,213
Tragic
$30,518
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,655
Tragic
$79,290
Median Household Income
Excellent
$88,388
Tragic
$69,695
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,697
Tragic
$35,942
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$55,954
Tragic
$39,504
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,353
Tragic
$32,730
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,440
Exceptional
$54,732
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,159
Tragic
$73,688
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,412
Tragic
$81,000
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,354
Average
$60,727
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.7%
Exceptional
24.7%

Immigrants from Chile vs Yup'ik Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 184.5%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 161.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 153.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 14.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 19.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 20.0%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Yup'ik Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChileYup'ik
Poverty
Average
12.2%
Tragic
20.8%
Families
Average
8.9%
Tragic
18.7%
Males
Average
11.1%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Average
13.3%
Tragic
21.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
27.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
24.3%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Tragic
27.7%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.7%
Tragic
25.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
24.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
25.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Tragic
26.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
32.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.4%
Tragic
32.5%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
13.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
14.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
15.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Tragic
32.7%

Immigrants from Chile vs Yup'ik Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 249.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 225.1%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 221.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 63.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 78.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 79.7%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Yup'ik Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChileYup'ik
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
13.6%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
16.4%
Females
Average
5.2%
Tragic
10.9%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
23.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
41.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
20.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
17.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
18.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
9.5%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
9.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
12.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
21.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Tragic
18.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
11.0%

Immigrants from Chile vs Yup'ik Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 70.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 5.1%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Yup'ik Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChileYup'ik
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
62.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
73.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
33.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
70.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
73.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
76.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
78.6%

Immigrants from Chile vs Yup'ik Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 145.4%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 81.0%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 60.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.5% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 5.6%), family households (64.6% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 16.3%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Yup'ik Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChileYup'ik
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Exceptional
72.4%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Exceptional
37.0%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.5%
Tragic
44.1%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Exceptional
4.00
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
5.4%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Tragic
10.0%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Tragic
39.9%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
10.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
31.2%
Tragic
56.4%

Immigrants from Chile vs Yup'ik Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 317.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 55.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 52.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 26.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 52.4%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Yup'ik Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChileYup'ik
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Tragic
45.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.1%
Tragic
58.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.2%
Tragic
34.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Tragic
14.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.1%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Chile vs Yup'ik Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (40.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 110.4%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 96.2%), and associate's degree (49.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 96.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.15%), 9th grade (94.5% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and 5th grade (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Yup'ik Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChileYup'ik
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
1.2%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Exceptional
99.2%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
99.2%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
99.2%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Exceptional
99.2%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
99.0%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
5th Grade
Poor
97.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Tragic
91.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
87.6%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Tragic
86.1%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.9%
Tragic
80.0%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.8%
Tragic
45.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.4%
Tragic
39.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.0%
Tragic
25.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Tragic
19.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
8.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
2.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Chile vs Yup'ik Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 252.4%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 108.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 71.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.77%), female disability (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 9.0%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Yup'ik Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChileYup'ik
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
4.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
37.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
61.1%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
2.7%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
1.9%