Immigrants from Chile vs Hispanic or Latino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,646,936 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Hispanics or Latinos within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.457. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 1.708% in Hispanics or Latinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to a decrease of 1,708.3 Hispanics or Latinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $35,688, a difference of 29.5%), median family income ($105,655 compared to $85,647, a difference of 23.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $80,515, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 3.4%), householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $50,279, a difference of 4.3%), and median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $34,421, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 41.6%), receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 37.9%), and family poverty (8.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 5.6%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.1%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 23.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 6.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.5%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 26.5%), and births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.5% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 2.5%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (64.6% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 25.4%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 21.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 66.1%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 60.1%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.88%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.89%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 23.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 21.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and female disability (11.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 8.7%).