Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Moldova Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,098,535 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.191. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Immigrants from Moldova. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to a decrease of 21.4 Immigrants from Moldova.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $56,168, a difference of 7.1%), median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $59,417, a difference of 6.2%), and median earnings ($47,697 compared to $50,274, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $62,939, a difference of 0.94%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and per capita income ($46,213 compared to $47,489, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 14.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 3.1%), receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.64%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 14.3%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), family households (64.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.7%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.1%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 12.2%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.4%).