Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Taiwan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,073,169 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.132. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.091% in Immigrants from Taiwan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 91.0 Immigrants from Taiwan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $129,122, a difference of 32.9%), median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $74,031, a difference of 32.3%), and median household income ($88,388 compared to $116,460, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $59,424, a difference of 13.3%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 14.6%), and median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $49,256, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 57.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 44.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 12.5%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 14.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 21.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.57%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 35.5%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 33.5%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.10%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and family households (64.6% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 42.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 23.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 51.9%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 34.3%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.050%), 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 29.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 28.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.1%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.0%).