Immigrants from Chile vs Taiwanese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Taiwanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Chile

Taiwanese

Good
Good
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Taiwanese Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,442,903 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.726. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.116% in Taiwanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 115.8 Taiwanese.
Immigrants from Chile Integration in Taiwanese Communities

Immigrants from Chile vs Taiwanese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $49,804, a difference of 5.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $101,492, a difference of 4.5%), and wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($47,697 compared to $47,902, a difference of 0.43%), per capita income ($46,213 compared to $46,455, a difference of 0.52%), and median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $40,576, a difference of 0.55%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Taiwanese Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChileTaiwanese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,213
Exceptional
$46,455
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,655
Exceptional
$107,295
Median Household Income
Excellent
$88,388
Exceptional
$89,900
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,697
Excellent
$47,902
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$55,954
Good
$55,556
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,353
Excellent
$40,576
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,440
Tragic
$49,804
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,159
Exceptional
$101,492
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,412
Excellent
$104,180
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,354
Excellent
$62,894
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.7%
Excellent
25.1%

Immigrants from Chile vs Taiwanese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 13.5%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.52%), male poverty (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and female poverty (13.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Taiwanese Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChileTaiwanese
Poverty
Average
12.2%
Good
12.2%
Families
Average
8.9%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Average
11.1%
Good
11.0%
Females
Average
13.3%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.7%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
14.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
10.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Exceptional
19.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.4%
Exceptional
27.5%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Excellent
11.0%

Immigrants from Chile vs Taiwanese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 37.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.94%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.99%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Taiwanese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChileTaiwanese
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Average
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Average
5.2%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
15.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Good
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
6.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%

Immigrants from Chile vs Taiwanese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.77%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.61%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.42%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Taiwanese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChileTaiwanese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
33.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Fair
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Exceptional
83.4%

Immigrants from Chile vs Taiwanese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.6%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.17%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Taiwanese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChileTaiwanese
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.5%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Poor
45.8%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
31.2%
Exceptional
29.0%

Immigrants from Chile vs Taiwanese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 0.62%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.72%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.0%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Taiwanese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChileTaiwanese
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Tragic
11.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.1%
Tragic
88.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.2%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Excellent
20.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.1%
Exceptional
7.0%

Immigrants from Chile vs Taiwanese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.4%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.30%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.31%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Taiwanese Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChileTaiwanese
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
97.5%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Poor
97.2%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Tragic
94.7%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Tragic
93.6%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Tragic
92.5%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Tragic
91.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.9%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.8%
Good
66.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.4%
Excellent
60.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.0%
Excellent
47.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Exceptional
40.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
16.1%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.1%

Immigrants from Chile vs Taiwanese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.7%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 8.7%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.67%), female disability (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Taiwanese Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChileTaiwanese
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Excellent
22.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.4%