Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Argentina Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,656,310 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.077% in Immigrants from Argentina. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 77.3 Immigrants from Argentina.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $49,627, a difference of 7.4%), median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $59,491, a difference of 6.3%), and median family income ($105,655 compared to $110,873, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $63,885, a difference of 2.5%), median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $41,554, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $54,209, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 9.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 8.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.0%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.53%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.51%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.7%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.44%), family households (64.6% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.19%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.8%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 8.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.2%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.1%).