Immigrants from Chile vs Samoan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,493,116 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.614. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.512% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 512.2 Samoans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $39,826, a difference of 16.0%), median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $51,389, a difference of 8.9%), and median earnings ($47,697 compared to $44,206, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.97%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $101,580, a difference of 1.8%), and median household income ($88,388 compared to $86,498, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 19.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.36%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.47%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 16.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 19.6%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.42, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.4% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.86%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.90%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 51.9%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 44.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 32.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 58.3%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 48.0%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.4% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.3%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 17.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.1%).