Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Jamaica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,555,665 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Immigrants from Jamaica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to a decrease of 19.0 Immigrants from Jamaica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 36.5%), per capita income ($46,213 compared to $38,766, a difference of 19.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $87,035, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $51,038, a difference of 2.8%), median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $38,625, a difference of 4.5%), and median earnings ($47,697 compared to $43,026, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 47.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 26.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 2.5%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and single female poverty (20.1% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 31.2%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 29.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 33.7%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 24.4%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.19%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.33, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 37.6%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 29.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 21.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 28.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 54.0%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 47.6%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.9%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.5%).