Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Iraq Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,553,132 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iraq within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.515. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.090% in Immigrants from Iraq. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to a decrease of 89.8 Immigrants from Iraq.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $41,365, a difference of 11.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $89,444, a difference of 8.6%), and median household income ($88,388 compared to $82,594, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $53,384, a difference of 1.8%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $59,824, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 15.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 12.9%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), female poverty (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.72%), and single female poverty (20.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 14.9%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.010%), family households (64.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 47.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 26.8%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 24.1%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.060%), 5th grade (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and 4th grade (97.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 14.3%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.8%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.6%).